Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 165/2014

Case between Ahammed Ismail.M vs Baiju regarding settlement and recall of warrant

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2018-06-25
Duration
3 years, 11 months, 11 days
Case Code No.
165
Case Closed
Mon, 06/25/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involved a settlement between the parties leading to full satisfaction and recall of warrant in Execution Application 172/18.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The matter was settled between the parties, leading to full satisfaction recorded and recall of warrant in Execution Application 172/18.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Settlement and recall of warrant
Case Type
Civil Suit - Execution Proceedings
Final Judgment
No
The matter was settled between the parties, leading to full satisfaction recorded and recall of warrant in Execution Application 172/18.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Matter settled between the parties resulting in full satisfaction and recall of warrant as recorded in Execution Application 172/18.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Matter settled between the parties resulting in full satisfaction and recall of warrant as recorded in Execution Application 172/18.
Supporting Evidence
Matter settled between the parties resulting in full satisfaction and recall of warrant as recorded in Execution Application 172/18.

Judgment Evidence:

Hearing advanced as per order in EA 172/18. Matter settled between the parties. Full satisfaction recorded. Recall warrant. EA 172/18- Allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ahammed Ismail.M
Party Age
41
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baiju
Party Age
38
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreekala Sudheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Baiju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Settlement and recall of warrant
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Settlement reached between parties with full satisfaction recorded, leading to recall of warrant.
Evidence:
Hearing advanced as per order in EA 172/18. Matter settled between the parties. Full satisfaction recorded. Recall warrant. EA 172/18- Allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Execution Proceedings
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2014

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 07/21/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/25/2018 - 12:00
From
Fri, 06/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Sat, 06/30/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Raghunandanan. M.V. et al regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between K.P.O.Kadeeja vs Kappalpadikkal Mani regarding delivery of property
Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate
Civil Suit - Execution Proceedings Plaintiff Won
Case between Ponmundam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Iravakkalayi Komukkutty regarding monetary claim
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Execution Proceedings Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Asharaf Athimannil et al regarding default in EP proceedings
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Execution Proceedings Defendant Won
Case between Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Limited vs K.Muhammed Shafi regarding debt repayment
Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Suit - Execution Proceedings Plaintiff Won