Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 466 / 2018

Case between Agappe Diagnostics Ltd. vs M/s Athens Corporations et al regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-10-24
Duration
approximately-6 years 5 months
Case Closed
Thu, 10/24/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Agappe Diagnostics Ltd. is suing M/s Athens Corporations and its managing partner Mr. Joseph Simon for failing to complete contracted flooring work and seeking recovery of money. The plaintiff claims significant losses due to the defendants' delays and failures in fulfilling their contractual obligations.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendants failed to complete the contracted work, resulting in financial losses for the plaintiff. The defendants are ordered to pay Rs. 8,53,308/- with interest to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 8,53,308/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of suit till decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendants failed to complete the contracted work, resulting in financial losses for the plaintiff. The defendants are ordered to pay Rs. 8,53,308/- with interest to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully established that the defendants did not fulfill their contractual obligations to complete the flooring work.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully established that the defendants did not fulfill their contractual obligations to complete the flooring work.
Supporting Evidence
On an overall appreciation of the facts and evidence of the case, I am satisfied that plaintiff has succeeded in establishing the case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. 1) Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.8,53,308/- (Rupees Eight lakhs fifty three thousand three hundred and eight only) from defendants with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of suit till decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Agappe Diagnostics Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Athens Corporations
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Joseph Simon
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Resolution dated 20.03.18, Emails dated 13.04.15, 17.04.15, 18.04.15, Purchase orders dated 26.05.15, 29.05.15, and 25.08.15.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M Gopikrishnan Nambiar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dominic Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Keshavraj Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joson Manavalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K R Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M S Letha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vimal Dev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sree Rekha K S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Pavan Rose Jhonson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Solomon Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.8,53,308/- from defendants with interest.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.8,53,308/- (Rupees Eight lakhs fifty three thousand three hundred and eight only) from defendants with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of suit till decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum till realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the proceedings from defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the proceedings from defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the resolution dated 20.03.18 passed by the board of directors of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True printout of the email issued by the 2nd defendant to the plaintiff with respect to the catalogue of their products dated 13.04.15.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True printout of the email sent by the 2nd defendant to the plaintiff dated 13.04.15.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True printout of the email dated 17.04.15 issued by the plaintiff to the defendants inviting them to attend the meeting.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True printout of the email dated 18.04.15 by which the quotation is forwarded by the defendants to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True printout of the email dated 30.04.15 by which the revised quotation with revised rate was issued by the defendants to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True printout of the email sent by the 2nd defendant to the plaintiff providing the final price on 19.05.2015.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter of intent issued by plaintiff and acknowledged and accepted by defendant dated 26.05.2015.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Purchase Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Purchase order dated 29.05.2015.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Purchase Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Purchase order dated 25.08.2015.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True printout of the email along with the certification and additional list of documents dated 14.10.15.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified printout of the bank statement of the plaintiff issued by the Federal bank dated 04.04.18.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Purchase Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Purchase order for Rs. 88,490/- issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Purchase Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Purchase order for Rs. 65,412/- issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True printout of the email sent by the plaintiff to the defendants dated 01.09.15.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True printout of the email along with the certification dated 21.10.15.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of letter issued by the plaintiff to the defendant dated 03.03.16.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified account statement of plaintiff for the period 06.06.15 issued by federal bank.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate statement of account issued by Axis bank, Perumbavoor Branch.
Reference:
Ext.A19

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Agappe Diagnostics Ltd. vs M/s Athens Corporations et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Agappe Diagnostics Ltd. vs M/s Athens Corporations et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/24/2024 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won