Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 485/2024

Case between Advanced Hair Restoration India Pvt. Ltd vs S R Premanandh Alias Premanandh Rajamanickam regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Advanced Hair Restoration India Pvt. Ltd as the plaintiff and S R Premanandh Alias Premanandh Rajamanickam as the defendant. The suit is about a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant for unauthorized access and handling of confidential information.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that it does not have territorial jurisdiction to try the case and returned the plaint for presentation before the proper court at Salem.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the cause of action arose in Salem and hence, the Ernakulam court lacked jurisdiction over the case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Preliminary issue is answered in favour of defendants. This court does not have territorial jurisdiction to try the suit. Plaint is returned to plaintiff for presentation before the civil Court at Salem having jurisdiction within six weeks.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Advanced Hair Restoration India Pvt. Ltd (Age not specified years) 6th Floor, KNA Plaza, Kundannoor Junction, Maradu P O, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 304

Defendants

S R Premanandh Alias Premanandh Rajamanickam (36 years years) D No. 330B/263, Ponnazhagi Colony, Kalar Kadu, Thiruvagoundanur, Salem, Tamil Nadu – 636 005

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Conditional Service Engagement Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement was executed by the parties to define their professional relationship.
Reference:
HOCSLM1049/2023
Document Type: Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement was aimed at protecting the confidentiality of sensitive data.
Reference:
HOCNDCA149/2023
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court considered the circumstances and testimonies presented during the hearings.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Wed, 04/12/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases