Case Summary
The petitioner, Adv. V Devashikhamony, filed a suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents, who are the defendants including Abdul Nazar Sait, to prevent them from trespassing into certain properties. The case involves issues related to missing documents and the review of previous court orders.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found an error apparent on the face of the record regarding the dismissal of I.A. No. 46/2025, determining that necessary copies were not issued to the plaintiff, which warranted review.
The court found an error apparent on the face of the record regarding the dismissal of I.A. No. 46/2025, determining that necessary copies were not issued to the plaintiff, which warranted review.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, 1) The above petition is allowed. Order dated 21.07.2025 dismissing IA 46/2025 and closure of evidence and posting case for hearing is reviewed in the interest of justice.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Adv. V Devashikhamony (80 years years)
1154A Near Paliam Lane, Mattancherry, Kochi- 682 002
Defendants
Abdul Nazar Sait (47 years years)
40/473, Munjappilly Bunglow, Jews Street, College P O, Ernakulam, Ernakulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kochi- 35
The Additional Thahasildar, Kanayannur Taluk (Age not specified years)
Taluk Office, Ernakulam- 682 011
The Taluk Surveyor, Kanayannur Taluk (Age not specified years)
Taluk Office, Ernakulam, Kochi- 682 011
The Village Officer, Ernakulam Village (Age not specified years)
Ernakulam- 682 011
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed and the order dated 21.07.2025 dismissing IA 46/2025 and closure of evidence is reviewed.
Evidence:
The above petition is allowed. Order dated 21.07.2025 dismissing IA 46/2025 and closure of evidence and posting case for hearing is reviewed in the interest of justice.