Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 707/2012

Case between Adiyath Ravindranath vs Santhosh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-12-06
Duration
approximately-12 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Adiyath Ravindranath filed a case against Santhosh for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain him from demolishing a compound wall around a property. This case follows a previous suit concerning the same property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by Adiyath Ravindranath to adjourn the further evidence for obtaining additional documents has been dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the petition was intended to prolong the proceedings without merit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Adiyath Ravindranath (Age not specified years) Swami Sadan, Market Road, Thripunithura, Nadama Desom, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Thripunithura P O, Pin- 682301, Ernakulam District.

Defendants

Santhosh (Age not specified years) Pathadath House, Vallilam Kara, Kalamasserry, Thrikkakara North Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner requested to adjourn the suits to obtain a modified resurvey sketch and the latest tax receipt as evidence.
Evidence:
Therefore the court is satisfied that this petition is intended only to protract the matter and hence there is no merits in the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The latest tax receipt pertaining to the plaint schedule property is to form part of the evidence.
Reference:
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The deed establishes the petitioner's ownership of the compound wall and the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Sale deed No. 3219/1999 of Edappally SRO

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2012 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases