Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 355/2024

Case between Adhithyan J. vs R. Ramadevi regarding an application for attachment

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition by Adhithyan J. against R. Ramadevi regarding an application for attachment. The court heard the petition and issued an order in favor of the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for attachment after reviewing the fixed deposit receipt and ensuring sufficient security was furnished.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for attachment after reviewing the fixed deposit receipt and ensuring sufficient security was furnished.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that sufficient security was furnished to raise the attachment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that sufficient security was furnished to raise the attachment.
Supporting Evidence
Sufficient security furnished to raise attachment.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition stands allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Adhithyan J.
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R. Ramadevi
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Fixed deposit receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.A. Shameer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswany Ajayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Sajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.G. Dileepkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.R. Sajithkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition for raising attachment allowed.
Evidence:
Sufficient security furnished to raise attachment. Hence petition stands allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Fixed Deposit Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Produced as sufficient security to raise attachment.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Adhithyan J. vs R. Ramadevi regarding an application for attachment
Case Code Year
Case between Adhithyan J. vs R. Ramadevi regarding an application for attachment

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Komalvalliyamma vs Meera et al regarding partition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between P.M.Gopalakrishnan Nair et al vs Adv.P.R.Rajan et al regarding declaration of easement right of way and injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anie Ittan W/o Ittan et al vs Kurian S/o Joseph regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby W/o Baby Joseph vs George S/o Paulose regarding declaration and injunction
THE MUNSIFF AT KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby, W/o Baby Joseph et al vs George S/o Paulose regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won