Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 355/2024

Case between Adhithyan J. vs R. Ramadevi regarding an application for attachment

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition by Adhithyan J. against R. Ramadevi regarding an application for attachment. The court heard the petition and issued an order in favor of the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for attachment after reviewing the fixed deposit receipt and ensuring sufficient security was furnished.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that sufficient security was furnished to raise the attachment.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition stands allowed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Adhithyan J. (Age not specified years) Chaithram House, Iringole P.O., Iringole Kara, Perumbavoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

R. Ramadevi (59 years years) House No. 307, Street No.4-B Cross, Opp. R.M. Nagar Police Station, 2nd Phase, Kasthoori Nagar, Bangalaore P.O., Ramamoorthi Nagar, Bangalore North Village, Bangalaore District, Karnadaka State

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition for raising attachment allowed.
Evidence:
Sufficient security furnished to raise attachment. Hence petition stands allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Fixed Deposit Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Produced as sufficient security to raise attachment.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases