Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS No.139/2001

Case between Aby et al vs T. M Avarachan regarding execution of decree

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Aby and others as plaintiffs against T. M Avarachan regarding the violation of a decree. The plaintiffs claim that the defendant trespassed into their property and installed a motor and pipeline.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the judgment debtor, T. M Avarachan, violated the decree by trespassing onto the plaintiffs' property. The court ordered the defendant to remove the encroachments and restore the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant directed to remove encroachment and restore property.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found clear evidence of violation of the decree.

Judgment Evidence:

It is found that the judgment debtor has trespassed into the counter-claim schedule property in violation of the decree. The judgment debtor is directed to remove the encroachment shown as Plot “A” in the Commissioner’s plan.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Aby (Age not specified years) Kallittikuzhy House, Vengoor Kara, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk. Geevarghese (Age not specified years) Kallittikuzhy House, Vengoor Kara, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk. Mary (Age not specified years) Kallittikuzhy House, Vengoor Kara, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk.

Defendants

T. M Avarachan (Age not specified years) Thekkumkudy House, Edathuruthu Bhagam, Vengoor Kara, Vengoor, Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The judgment debtor is directed to remove the encroachment and restore the property to its original position.
Evidence:
The judgment debtor is directed to remove the encroachment shown as Plot “A” in the Commissioner’s plan and restore the said portion of the counter-claim schedule property to its original position as reflected in the trial-stage commission reports.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The judgment debtor is further directed to remove the motor and pipeline installed in the counter-claim schedule property.
Evidence:
The judgment debtor is further directed to remove the motor and pipeline installed in the counter-claim schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner's Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court used the commissioner's reports and plans to identify the counter-claim schedule property and assess the violation of the decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1, Ext.C2, Ext.C2(a), Ext.C2(b)

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases