Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1491/2019

Case between Abith vs Nagadurga Rao regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Abith and Cherian Antony, are seeking a permanent injunction against the defendant, Nagadurga Rao, who claims sole proprietorship over their partnership firm, Craftmade. The case involves allegations of fraud and misappropriation of funds by the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed partly, restraining the defendant from using the partnership property for personal use and from preventing the plaintiffs from accessing it. The defendant was also ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from using the plaint schedule property for personal use.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed partly on the following terms. 1) Defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from using the plaint schedule property for his personal use and his business apart from the business of partnership firm Craftmade in which the plaintiffs and defendant are partners and committing any waste therein.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abith (34 years) 37(18/302). E D Flat-17, Udyogamandal P O, Eloor Village, Paravur Taluk, Ernakulam District Cherian Antony (38 years) Thottunkathara House, Kadavanthra P O, Kanayannur Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Nagadurga Rao (34 years) Vithanala House, Udyogamandal P O, Eloor North, Ernakulam- 683501

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Defendant is restrained from using the plaint schedule property for personal use apart from the business of the partnership firm Craftmade.
Evidence:
Defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from using the plaint schedule property for his personal use and his business apart from the business of partnership firm Craftmade in which the plaintiffs and defendant are partners and committing any waste therein.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Defendant is restrained from preventing plaintiffs from entering the plaint schedule property as partners of the firm.
Evidence:
Defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from preventing the plaintiffs to enter into the plaint schedule property as partners of the firm.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Retail Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows a retail invoice of the firm Craftmade.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A letter dated 05.11.2019 issued from Federal Bank, Kottayam branch.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: GST Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A GST invoice of the firm Craftmade.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the partnership deed of the firm Craftmade Solution.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases