ORIGINAL SUIT No. 340 OF 2014

Case between Abida et al vs Kuttihassan et al regarding declaration and injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

SMT. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2018-06-18

Duration

4 years

Case Closed

Mon, 06/18/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs Abida and Rasiya filed a suit against defendants seeking declaration and injunction. However, as the plaintiff was absent with no representation, the suit was dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Decided

Case Type

Civil Suit - Declaration and Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit for declaration and injunction was dismissed due to the absence and lack of representation by the plaintiff.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff reported no instruction. Name of plaintiff is called absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 18ᵗʰ day of June, 2018)

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Abida
Party Age: 39
Relation: D/o Thayyil Sainudheen

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rasiya
Party Age: 33
Relation: D/o Thayyil Sainudheen

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kuttihassan
Relation: S/o Kunhali

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Yoosaf
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o Kuttihassan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nafeesa
Party Age: 46
Relation: W/o Yoosaf

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shahid
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o Kuttihassan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Thithikkutty
Party Age: 37
Relation: W/o Shahid

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Methil Beerankutty
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o Kunhavutty

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jameela
Relation: W/o Beerankutty

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rukhiya
Relation: W/o Kunhappu

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Subaida
Relation: W/o Usman

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Safiya
Relation: W/o Saidalavi

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.T.Ramgopal
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt.Sara.K.P.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration and Injunction

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Seeking declaration and injunction.

Evidence:

Plaintiff reported no instruction. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification