Case Summary
Case involving multiple parties regarding default judgment due to plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to default judgment.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Defendant represented. The case stands for appearance of plaintiff for so many posting days. The plaintiff always absent and there is no representation too. Notice served plaintiff counsel, then too no representation. Notice could not be served to the plaintiff as notice returned the address not known. Hence I think the suit can be dismissed for default. Hence suit dismissed. No Cost. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 23ʳᵈ day of September, 2025) Sd/- Sirsha NA Munsiff
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abhilash N
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o Nagenedran Nair C
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Arun Kumar
- Party Age
- 36
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Others
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kent Mahal Owners Association
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekumar M.N
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o Neelakandakurup
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jomon A
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o George Abraham
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shalini Pillai
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o Vijai Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Others
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abhilash N et al vs Kent Mahal Owners Association et al regarding Unknown
Case Code Year
Case between Abhilash N et al vs Kent Mahal Owners Association et al regarding Unknown