Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 302 OF 2017

Case between Abdurahiman Haji et al vs Rajesh.C.K. et al regarding money realisation

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-04-13
Duration
Approximately 1 year
Case Closed
Fri, 04/13/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdurahiman Haji filed a suit against Rajesh.C.K. seeking realisation of Rs.50,000 loaned to Rajesh for house construction, as per an agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of Abdurahiman Haji, directing Rajesh.C.K. to pay the loan amount with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decreed payment of Rs.50,000 with 6% interest per annum from 30-11-2014
Case Type
Civil Suit - Realisation of Money
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of Abdurahiman Haji, directing Rajesh.C.K. to pay the loan amount with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdurahiman Haji
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh.C.K.
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lakshyam dated 1-6-2013
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Najmudheen.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.C.P.Jamshid Rahman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Loan Realisation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decreed payment of Rs.50,000 with 6% interest per annum from 30-11-2014
Evidence:
The plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall pay the plaintiff cost of the suit
Evidence:
Not available

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lakshyam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved the loan agreement and payment made by plaintiff to defendant.
Reference:
A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Realisation of Money
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Loan agreement for house construction
Case Code
Case between Abdurahiman Haji et al vs Rajesh.C.K. et al regarding money realisation
Case Code Year
Case between Abdurahiman Haji et al vs Rajesh.C.K. et al regarding money realisation

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 04/13/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 04/13/2018 - 12:00
From
Sun, 04/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Mon, 04/30/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between C.S.Nanu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thami et al vs Suresh Babu regarding an order to pay costs
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cheriya Kallyapurath Muhammed Hashim vs Naduvilaparambil Ali Haji regarding unknown
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Kader vs Rayu regarding petition with cost payment condition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideenkutty vs Ismail regarding realisation of money
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Realisation of money Plaintiff Won