Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1085/2020

Case between Abdul Vahab vs Shaik Mohammed et al regarding settlement of a dispute.

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-02-27
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 months
Case Code No.
1085
Case Closed
Thu, 02/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Vahab filed a suit against Shaik Mohammed and Jameela regarding a legal dispute. The matter was finally heard, and both parties reached a settlement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the settlement terms signed by both parties and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the settlement terms signed by both parties and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Matter settled. report filed as IA 4/25. Terms lawful signed by both parties and counsels concerned. Accepted and suit decreed in terms of compromise petition IA 4/25.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Vahab
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaik Mohammed
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jameela
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise petition IA 4/25.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.K.Asok
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.P.Suraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. B.R.Pavithralal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajeev Chempakassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Poonthura Tharif.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Interim Application
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the terms of the compromise petition IA 4/25, which was signed by both parties and counsels, and decreed the suit in terms of this compromise.
Reference:
IA 4/25

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 03/27/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 02/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won