Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 175 of 2015

Case between Abdul Salam et al vs Sulaikha et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G.
Order Date
2016-03-28
Duration
Approximately 1 year
Case Closed
Mon, 03/28/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Salam and Aboobacker filed a suit against Sulaikha, Ummukulsu, Fathimma, Mujeeb Rahman, and Hajra seeking partition of the properties inherited from their father.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a final decree for partition based on a compromise between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of properties as per compromise terms
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a final decree for partition based on a compromise between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise petition are lawful, IA.3551/2015 is allowed. Hence the final decree for partition is to be passed in terms of the compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Salam
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o Muhammad
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aboobacker
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o Muhammad
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaikha
Party Age
49
Relation
D/c Mohamed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ummukulsu
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o Abdul Salam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathimma
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o Muhammad @ Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mujeeb Rahman
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o Muhammad @ Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hajra
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o Muhammad @ Bava
Plaintiffs Documents
Document Nos. 112/1949, 160/1957, 1163/1963, No.233/2001, No.2186/2011
Defendants Documents
Document No.233/2001

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition as per compromise terms
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise petition are lawful, IA.3551/2015 is allowed. Hence the final decree for partition is to be passed in terms of the compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Document Nos. 112/1949
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Property ownership
Reference:
SRO, Kuttipuram
Document Type: Document No.233/2001
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Partition deed
Reference:
SRO, Kuttipuram

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Salam et al vs Sulaikha et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Salam et al vs Sulaikha et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 03/28/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 03/28/2016 - 12:00
From
Tue, 03/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Thu, 03/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Naseera et al vs Moideenkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ammunni et al vs Velukkutty et al regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Partial
Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between Kadiyumma vs Pathummakutty et al. regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Thottupurath Kormman's Son Chatha et al vs Koran et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won