Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 32/2024

Case between Abdul Manaf M.K vs Vijimol V.V et al regarding maintainability

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Manaf M.K is the plaintiff, and Vijimol V.V along with others are the defendants. The case was about the maintainability of the suit, but the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of the plaintiff despite being specifically posted for appearance. The case was about maintainability.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent without representation as specifically instructed.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Manaf M.K (29 years) Veliyil, Udayamperoor, Manakunnam, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 307

Defendants

Vijimol V.V (38 years) Thoppillil House, Udayamperoor, Manakunnam, Ernakulam – 682 307 Meghanathan V.S (15 years) Thoppillil House, Udayamperoor, Manakunnam, Ernakulam – 682 307 Manjunathan V.S (15 years) Thoppillil House, Udayamperoor, Manakunnam, Ernakulam – 682 307 Vijayan T.K (70 years) Thoppillil House, Udayamperoor, Manakunnam, Ernakulam, Udayamperoor, Kerala 682 307 Vijayamma (67 years) Thoppilli House, Udayamperoor, Manakunnam, Ernakulam, Udayamperoor, Kerala 682 307

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases