Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 32/2024

Case between Abdul Manaf M.K vs Vijimol V.V et al regarding maintainability

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Manaf M.K is the plaintiff, and Vijimol V.V along with others are the defendants. The case was about the maintainability of the suit, but the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of the plaintiff despite being specifically posted for appearance. The case was about maintainability.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of the plaintiff despite being specifically posted for appearance. The case was about maintainability.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent without representation as specifically instructed.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent without representation as specifically instructed.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent without representation, when specifically posted for appearance of plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Manaf M.K
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijimol V.V
Party Age
38
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Meghanathan V.S
Party Age
15
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manjunathan V.S
Party Age
15
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayan T.K
Party Age
70
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayamma
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. V Sabu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Minu Siby Roy
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nikhil K Sabu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Isamol Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Manaf M.K vs Vijimol V.V et al regarding maintainability
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Manaf M.K vs Vijimol V.V et al regarding maintainability

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won