Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 20 OF 2018

Case between Abdul Majeed vs V.P.Musthafa regarding rent control petition

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-03-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Majeed filed a rent control petition against V.P.Musthafa regarding possession of rented premises. The respondent did not comply with a previous order to deposit the required amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to put the landlord, Abdul Majeed, in possession of the petition schedule rooms within 1 month.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule rooms within 1 month.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to put the landlord, Abdul Majeed, in possession of the petition schedule rooms within 1 month.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with a previous order, showing no sufficient reason.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with a previous order, showing no sufficient reason.
Supporting Evidence
From the proceedings, it is seen that the respondent did not comply order dated 17-1-2019. No sufficient reason is shown and no explanation is offered by the respondent as to why the amount is not deposited.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence further proceedings against the tenant is stopped u/s 12(3) and the respondent is directed to put the land lord in possession of the petition schedule rooms within 1 month from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Majeed
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.P.Musthafa
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Vipin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. P. G. Nisha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule rooms within 1 month from today.
Evidence:
Hence further proceedings against the tenant is stopped u/s 12(3) and the respondent is directed to put the land lord in possession of the petition schedule rooms within 1 month from today.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Majeed vs V.P.Musthafa regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Majeed vs V.P.Musthafa regarding rent control petition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Parayil Muhammedkutty vs Kinassery Parambil Sugathan regarding rental agreement settlement
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Partial
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs K.P. Saidalavi regarding rent control petition
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won