Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 95/2024

Case between Abdul Latheef vs Pradeep Kumar T.V. regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Latheef filed a Rent Control Petition against Pradeep Kumar T.V. regarding a rental dispute. The case involved a compromise between the two parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed based on the compromise agreement between both parties. The terms of the compromise were found lawful and voluntarily agreed upon.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were lawful and agreed upon by both parties.

Judgment Evidence:

IA 02/2024 is allowed. Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise. Compromise terms shall form part of final order.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Latheef (61 years) Noor Manzil, Elamakkara P.O., Ernakulam, Pin­682 026

Defendants

Pradeep Kumar T.V. (53 years) Thondiparambil Viswamngalam, Anglo Indian School Cross Road, School Padi, Vaduthala, Cochin­682 023

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compromise petition is allowed.
Evidence:
Hence, IA 02/2024 is allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases