Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 42 OF 2016

Case between Abdul Khadar et al vs Entheen kutty regarding lease and rent control

Court
RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-06-22
Duration
1 year 6 months
Case Closed
Fri, 06/22/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Khadar and Prakash.R filed a petition against Entheen kutty seeking vacant possession of a room as per a lawful compromise where Abdul Khadar paid Rs.2,75,000 to Entheen kutty.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, ordering Entheen kutty to provide vacant possession of the room to Abdul Khadar before 30-6-2018 as per the lawful compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of petition schedule room
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, ordering Entheen kutty to provide vacant possession of the room to Abdul Khadar before 30-6-2018 as per the lawful compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Petition filed u/s. 11 (3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. Compromise filed. The petitioner has given Rs.2,75,000/- to the respondent. The respondent permitted to give vacant possession of the building to the petitioner on or before 30-6-2018.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Khadar
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o Muhammedali
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prakash.R
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o C.Rajan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Entheen kutty
Party Age
61
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Vacant Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Provide vacant possession of the petition schedule room as per compromise terms.
Evidence:
The petitioner has given Rs.2,75,000/- to the respondent. The respondent permitted to give vacant possession of the building to the petitioner on or before 30-6-2018.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Unknown
Case Code
Case between Abdul Khadar et al vs Entheen kutty regarding lease and rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Khadar et al vs Entheen kutty regarding lease and rent control

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/22/2018 - 12:00
From
Fri, 06/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Sat, 06/30/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Parayil Muhammedkutty vs Kinassery Parambil Sugathan regarding rental agreement settlement
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Partial
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs K.P. Saidalavi regarding rent control petition
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won