Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No . 82/2021

Case between Abdul Kareem vs Suresh et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Kareem is the plaintiff who has been continuously absent from the hearings. The defendants, represented by their advocates, attended the court. As a result of the plaintiff's absence, the suit was dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's continuous absence from hearings. The defendants were present and represented by advocates.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff is continuously absent in listed case and not present or represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Kareem (54 years years) Thekkumkattil House, Mariyilthazham P.O, Edakkattuvayal Village, Ernakulam District – 682 315

Defendants

Suresh (35 years years) Chathoth House, Kanjiramattom P.O, Amballoor Village, Ernakulam District 682 315 Sanoop (38 years years) Palathunkal House, Kanjiramattom P.O, Amballoor Village, Ernakulam District 682 315 Vinu (45 years years) Kalarikkal mittom House, Kanjiramattiom P.O, Amballoor Village, Ernakulam District 682 315 Latha (40 years years) Pullattuparambil House, Kanjiramattom P.O, Amballoor Village, Ernakulam District 682 315 Akhil Raj (22 years years) Pullattuparambil House, Kanjiramattom P.O, Amballoor Village, Ernakulam District 682 315

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit dismissed due to continuous absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is continuously absent in listed case and not present or represented. Dismissed with cost.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases