Case Summary
Abdul Kareem filed a suit for injunction against Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd and others. The suit was withdrawn as the operator agreement between the plaintiff and the second defendant had expired.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was permitted to withdraw the suit due to the expiration of the operator agreement, resulting in the case being dismissed as withdrawn.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court allowed the withdrawal of the suit as it was found to be infructuous.
The court allowed the withdrawal of the suit as it was found to be infructuous.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court allowed the withdrawal of the suit as it was found to be infructuous.
The court allowed the withdrawal of the suit as it was found to be infructuous.
Supporting Evidence
Hence the suit is withdrawn.
Judgment Evidence:
Therefore suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Kareem
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Veritas Global Foods and Beverages Pvt.Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sai
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- Floor Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.A.Muhammed Shah
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Renoy Vincent
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shahir Showkath Ali
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Chelson Chembarathy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- AbeeShejirikFasla
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Junaid.V
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adith Krishnan.U
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Fathima Afeeda
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nabeel Shah Ibrahim
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shibu.V.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ayisha.T.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Varghese.K.Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kashmeera Ashraf
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sneha Divakaran.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anamika Sasikumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff withdrew the suit.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is withdrawn.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Kareem vs Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Kareem vs Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd et al regarding injunction