Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No 1029/2014

Case between Abdul Kareem vs P.R. Danavan et al regarding settlement of suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-26
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 03/26/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Kareem is the plaintiff in this case, while P.R. Danavan and others are the defendants. The case involves a settlement reached between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of compromise, and the court satisfied that the terms are lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the entire court fee.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of entire court fee including Legal Benefit Fund
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of compromise, and the court satisfied that the terms are lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the entire court fee.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Kareem
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.R. Danavan
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suja
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun Sagar
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amrutha
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.T. Anil Kumar (Anil Mamala)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kabil Chandran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Reji George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.P. Sreenivasan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manju Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saisankar.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. Hari Govind Menon
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise
Evidence:
Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful. Suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Kareem vs P.R. Danavan et al regarding settlement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Kareem vs P.R. Danavan et al regarding settlement of suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 03/26/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won