Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No 1029/2014

Case between Abdul Kareem vs P.R. Danavan et al regarding settlement of suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Kareem is the plaintiff in this case, while P.R. Danavan and others are the defendants. The case involves a settlement reached between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of compromise, and the court satisfied that the terms are lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the entire court fee.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of entire court fee including Legal Benefit Fund
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Kareem (58 years) Thoppil Ponnanthara House, Kakkanad, Pin – 682 030

Defendants

P.R. Danavan (56 years) Parambatheril House, Neduvanoor, Chowara.P.O., Pin – 683 571 Suja (68 years) Parambatheril House, Neduvannur, Chowara.P.O., Aluva – 683 571 Arun Sagar (38 years) Parambatheril House, Neduvannur, Chowara.P.O., Aluva, Pin – 683 571 Amrutha (35 years) Parambatheril House, Neduvannur, Chowara.P.O., Aluva, Pin – 683 571

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise
Evidence:
Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful. Suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases