Case Summary
This case involves Abdul Kareem Sait who claims that the defendants borrowed Rs.2,25,000/- from him and have failed to repay the outstanding balance. The defendants deny the allegations and assert that no such transaction occurred.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not provide adequate evidence to substantiate his claims.
The plaintiff did not provide adequate evidence to substantiate his claims.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Abdul Kareem Sait (60 years years)
42/2260, B4, Jewel Spark, Providence Road, Kochi- 682018
Defendants
Shanoj Payyampally (40 years years)
Jawan’s Nest, Ayyappanthodu, Manjattidom, Sankaranelloor, Kannur, Pin: 670643
Roshanara C K (40 years years)
Lotus Mahal, Chettiyamkandi, Moodadi North P O, Kozhikode, Pin- 673307
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs.1,25,000/- with interest from the defendants.
Evidence:
Accordingly, I have no hesitation to hold that plaintiff is not entitled for any amounts from defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show the legal demand for repayment of the amount owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence of the defendants acknowledging receipt of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document also serves as evidence of the defendants acknowledging receipt of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3