Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No . 38/2022

Case between Abdul Iqbal Mohammed Kannan vs Sujatha Menon et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiff Abdul Iqbal Mohammed Kannan and defendants Sujatha Menon, Lathika K. Govind, and K. Govind Menon. The plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not represent himself in court.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Iqbal Mohammed Kannan (57 years years) Plot 80, Kakson House, Chembur Mumbai - 400 071

Defendants

Sujatha Menon (58 years years) 41/781, Bhajagovindam, Pullepady Road, Cochin – 682 035 Lathika K. Govind (55 years years) 41/782, Bhajagovindam, Pullepady Road, Ernakulam K. Govind Menon (63 years years) 41/782, 'Bhajagovindam', Pullepady Road, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases