Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 38/2022

Case between Abdul Iqbal Mohammed Kannan vs Sujatha Menon et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiff Abdul Iqbal Mohammed Kannan and defendants Sujatha Menon, Lathika K. Govind, and K. Govind Menon. The plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not represent himself in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Iqbal Mohammed Kannan
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujatha Menon
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lathika K. Govind
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Govind Menon
Party Age
63
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Peeyus A. Kottam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arjun S. Benedict
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jeevan T. Charles
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajmal Ahmed. R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Iqbal Mohammed Kannan vs Sujatha Menon et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Iqbal Mohammed Kannan vs Sujatha Menon et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won