Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 338/2021

Case between Abdul Hameed vs Sakeer Hussain C K regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Abdul Hameed, claims ownership of a private road and seeks an injunction against the defendant, Sakeer Hussain C K, who he alleges is attempting to encroach upon this road. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and rights of access.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of the claimed 7.7 meter private road and dismissed the suit with costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff could not demonstrate the identifiable location or ownership of the pathway claimed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence from the above discussion court is satisfied that plaintiff has failed to prove his case and the suit is liable to be dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Hameed (70 years) Kavungal House, Pulikkillam East Road, Chembumukku, Kakkanad West P O, Vazhakkala Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Sakeer Hussain C K (57 years) Charuvil Veettil, Adarsh Road, CSEZ P O, Pin - 682 037, Kakkanad Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought an injunction to restrain the defendant from encroaching on the property.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that the plaintiff has failed to prove his case and the suit is liable to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought an injunction to remove unauthorized construction by the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has not taken any steps to identify any construction made by the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the defendant's purchase of property and its boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details prior sale of the defendant's property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details further prior sale of the defendant's property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Describes the alleged right of way for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Complaint and Reply
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the plaintiff's complaint to the municipality regarding encroachment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Confirms the defendant's ownership and boundaries of the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Asthi Register Page
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Demonstrates that the pathway is recognized as a municipal road.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further supports the defendant's claims regarding property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Confirms prior ownership and boundaries in relation to the defendant's property.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further clarifies sales and boundaries related to the defendant's property.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documents the findings on the property boundaries and width.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visually represents the property and its boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases