Case Summary
Abdu filed a petition allowing cost paid.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed with cost paid
Case Type
Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition as cost paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid. petition stands allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saidu Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Usman
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E.M.Purushothaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Unknown
Description:
Unknown
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTR
Case Code Year
2015