Case Summary
Abdu, the plaintiff, filed a suit for injunction against Saidu Haji and The Federal Bank. The plaintiff's request for adjournment was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the suit in the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Injunction suit dismissed with cost
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed with costs due to plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
the suit is dismissed with cost
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdu
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o Saidu Haj
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saidu Haji
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o Mammukkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Federal Bank
- Relation
- Represented by General Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E.M.Purushothaman
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Suresh. K.M
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. Rajendran
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed with cost
Description:
Suit for injunction dismissed due to plaintiff's absence
Evidence:
the suit is dismissed with cost
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Injunction
Case Code
Case between Abdu vs Saidu Haji et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdu vs Saidu Haji et al regarding injunction